Personalization at scale
Every learner has a unique knowledge graph. Static curriculum can't branch fast enough to serve all of them.
IRT + Knowledge graphClassrooms have one teacher and thirty students moving at thirty different paces. We build the platforms that close that gap — adaptive paths, AI tutors that respect the syllabus, and the analytics that tell a teacher who needs help before the parent-teacher meeting does.
The cost of one teacher is finite. The cost of one tutor that runs all night is not. The question isn't whether AI belongs in the classroom — it's how it shows up without removing the teacher from the centre of it.
Classroom ratio that hasn't moved in 60 years. Bloom's 2-sigma problem has been waiting for technology to solve it — and now it can.
Of students fall behind on a single mis-mastered prerequisite. By the time the gap shows on a test, three weeks of catch-up is required.
Global LMS market. Yet most institutions still have an LMS that's essentially a 1998 file-share with a forum bolted on.
Of higher-ed dropout decisions are made in week 6. Engagement signals to predict it exist by week 3 — if you're looking.
Every educator we talk to says the same thing: "I have the data, I just can't see it in time." That's the problem we keep solving.
Every learner has a unique knowledge graph. Static curriculum can't branch fast enough to serve all of them.
IRT + Knowledge graphA generic LLM will invent a prerequisite, contradict the textbook, or confidently solve the problem the wrong way.
Curriculum RAGRoster in one system, grades in another, attendance in a third. Teachers spend 8h/week reconciling.
LTI 1.3 · OneRosterClick-streams without context tell you nothing. Mastery velocity, hesitation, retries — those tell you everything.
Early-warning MLPlagiarism, proctoring, AI-generated submissions. The integrity problem moved faster than most policies.
Liveness + driftFERPA, COPPA, state student-data laws, GDPR for international cohorts. Every integration is a privacy decision.
PII minimizationBring your own LMS, SIS, content library or rubric — these modules slot in beside them with LTI 1.3 and OneRoster, and never ask you to switch.
Mastery-based pathways with item-response calibration. The next question is the one this learner needs, not the next one on the syllabus.
LLM tutors grounded in your textbook, your worked examples, your rubric. They never invent prerequisites — and they hand back to a human at the first sign of confusion.
Time-on-task, mastery velocity, hesitation patterns. Teacher dashboards that surface the at-risk learner this week, not after the term ends.
LTI 1.3, OneRoster, Common Cartridge, SCORM 2004, xAPI. We make the systems you have talk to each other without a manual import.
Liveness, gaze, room-scan, screen-share and AI-generated-content drift detection — applied only where the stakes warrant it.
For corporate L&D and continuing education — competency frameworks, skills graphs, verifiable credentials and ROI-grade dashboards.
A single learner event — a hesitation, a wrong answer, a re-attempt — flows through six clean stops on its way to becoming a teacher's next action.
From early-years through doctoral programs, from corporate L&D to government workforce schemes — and the EdTech start-ups serving all of them.
Three thousand learners, eleven languages, one inherited LMS. We layered an adaptive math platform with an AI tutor that respected the state syllabus. By week 6, teachers had named at-risk learners they'd previously caught at semester end. By term end, course completion was up by a third.
Student data is the most precious data we touch. We minimize, encrypt and segregate by default — and we don't train external models on your learners' work, period.
A 60-minute working session with a senior engineer and a learning-science lead. We'll review your stack, your standards and your week-3 dropout problem.